Share This Article
The process of creating a book, I find, is to make a lot of things. If you make a book, it has to look like a book. If you make a book, it has to be something that’s not a book. If you make a book, you have to have a lot of people who are going to agree with what you’re saying.
In general, I think books are a poor medium for discussing ideas because ideas are just ideas, they’re not inherently good or bad. And I don’t know that a book itself is inherently good or bad. So it makes sense that books that have an audience will probably be better at communicating that message than something that has no audience.
The most effective way to communicate a message is through story. I don’t have to tell you that. The best books tell stories, because they are written to be read, not to be talked about.
One of the best books I read recently was Richard Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene. It was an absolutely fantastic story about how selfish genes are in humans, but they aren’t. I loved it. It was an absolutely fantastic story that made me think a lot about how selfish genes operate in the world. Dawkins is a biologist, and a biologist is, by definition, not a poet.
It’s true that science is the study of the natural world, not the study of human beings. What I mean is that scientists are not poets. Scientists are scientists, and they study the natural world. This is important because the natural world is a very personal thing, and is something that is much easier to access when you have very personal relationships with the natural world.
Scientists don’t just study natural phenomena. They study something that happens to a particular person. This is because the natural world is not a static thing. It is constantly changing and always changing. In other words, everything that happens in the natural world is a product of a person’s genetics. Therefore, scientists are actually studying the process of evolution, not the process of evolution in a particular individual.
As a result, scientists love to study evolution because it helps them understand the process that has shaped the natural world. It allows them to understand how things are designed to change and create new species and new species of things. For instance, many scientists are extremely interested in how plants grow, how animals are born, and how they live. Scientists study these things because that is the way evolution works. Evolution is something you see and you just have to understand it.
But this is not the same as studying evolution. That is, evolutionary biology is concerned with the ways in which organisms change over time. It is what is known as “natural selection”. Evolutionary biologists know that evolution is a natural process. That is, it’s something that happens over time, and as it happens, new species arise.
So if you think evolution is a natural phenomenon, then it is not so much like the Darwinian view of evolution as it is like your understanding of the human genome as a computer program. There are millions upon millions of genes on the human genome, and we may not even know all of the genes that play a role in our unique biological individuality. So instead of studying the evolution of an animal or plant, evolutionary biologists study the evolution of a gene.
As it turns out, genes are very important for the evolution of an animal. Because genes are instructions for a particular trait, a mutation in a single gene can change a creature’s characteristics. So if a mutation in a gene for a trait we find most interesting takes place a few thousand years ago, it could have very important implications for our species. If a mutation leads to a smaller brain, then the human brain is probably a lot smaller than we thought it was.
